Mazi Liguney

Main Menu

  • Home
  • California payday
  • California car loans
  • California mortgages
  • California insurance
  • Capital

Mazi Liguney

Header Banner

Mazi Liguney

  • Home
  • California payday
  • California car loans
  • California mortgages
  • California insurance
  • Capital
California insurance
Home›California insurance›California’s highest court to consider employer liability for COVID infections

California’s highest court to consider employer liability for COVID infections

By Daniel Templeten
June 23, 2022
0
0

(Reuters) – California’s highest state court has agreed to decide whether employers can be held liable under state law when their workers contract COVID-19 on the job and pass it on to loved ones.

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday granted a request from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear a case brought by Corby Kuciemba, who says she fell seriously ill with COVID-19 after her husband was exposed to the virus while working with Victory Woodworks Inc. in San Francisco.

Ms Kuciemba, in a 2020 lawsuit, accused Victory of negligence and creating “public nuisance” by failing to enact safety policies to stop the spread of COVID. She is appealing a ruling by a federal judge in San Francisco who said her claims were covered by workers’ compensation and she could not sue Victory in court.

Business groups have said allowing employers to be held liable for so-called “take-home” COVID infections will result in lawsuits not just from family and friends of workers, but from anyone infected with this circle of people.

Companies like Amazon.com Inc., Walmart Inc., McDonald’s Corp. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. have faced similar lawsuits. Lawyers for Ms. Kucimeba and Victory Woodworks did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In April, the 9th Circuit asked the California Supreme Court to hear the case, saying the state court should decide whether the state’s workers’ compensation law covers workers’ COVID infections. relatives of workers and whether employers have a general legal obligation to prevent the spread of COVID.

Federal appellate courts can ask state courts to answer new questions that arise under state law. The California Supreme Court will decide the legal issues, leaving the 9th Circuit to apply its decision to Ms. Kuciemba’s case.

Earlier in April, the California Supreme Court declined to review a state appeals court’s ruling that a See’s Candies Inc. employee whose husband died after giving him COVID-19 could sue the company. It was the first such decision.

The current case is Kuciemba vs. Victory WoodworksCalifornia Supreme Court.

Related posts:

  1. Wildfire victims lose bid to send PG&E insurance dispute to state court – Courthouse News Service
  2. Health Insurance Guys: New Kind of Health Insurance Explains 2021 US Rescue Law | Business
  3. CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Tracking Privacy Concerns
  4. DOL leadership, paycheck fairness and more

Categories

  • California car loans
  • California insurance
  • California mortgages
  • California payday
  • Capital

Recent Posts

  • Wildfires destroy almost all forest carbon offsets in 100-year reserve, study finds
  • Equifax errors added $154 to Florida woman’s monthly loan payment, lawsuit says – NBC Los Angeles
  • Native American Basketball Invitational Full Scholarship Offered at the University of Phoenix
  • New US funding cuts hundreds of jobs
  • August is National Immunization Awareness Month

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy